Legal Opinion

State v. Staten

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1991No. 90-232PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.

The State charged that Shawn J. Staten intended to deliver or distribute cocaine in her possession, a violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-416(l)(a) (Cum. Supp. 1988). In her suppression motions, Staten claimed that cocaine found on her person and her custodial statements were constitutionally inadmissible. See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-115 (Reissue 1989) (suppression of accused’s statement) and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-822 (Reissue 1989) (suppression of physical evidence). When the district court for Douglas County sustained Staten’s motions, the State obtained a review by a judge of this court…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. ColemanNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  3. State v. OrtizNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. TwohigNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API