Legal Opinion
United States v. Whitehurst
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 6, 1987No. 87-46PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF REMOVAL AND DETENTION
JANICE M. SYMCHYCH, United States Magistrate.
The above matter was before the undersigned on July 2, 1987, upon motion of the United States for removal, pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 40(a), and for an order of detention, pursuant to the Bail Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e). Defendant was present and represented by Bruce Hanley, Esq. and John Remington Graham, Esq. Assistant United States Attorney Joseph T. Walbran represented the United States. After hearing and argument, the court is convinced that both motions should be granted, for the following reasons.
I.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- United States v. Leonel PortesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Albert Samuel Fortna, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Storie Lynn OrtaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Godofredo MartirCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Saldana-BeltranDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
- United States v. Martinez-LeonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008