Legal Opinion
United States v. Godofredo Martir
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 3, 1986No. 788, Docket 86-1005PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, Chief Judge:
The Bail Reform Act of 1984 creates a rebuttable presumption that a person accused of certain serious narcotics offenses will flee before trial. This case presents several important issues new to this circuit regarding the effect of the presumption and the type of showing needed to justify the detention of such a defendant who has comé forward with material to rebut it. Godofredo Mártir appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Mark A. Constantino, J., that he be detained pending trial. Because we find that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Mark JessupCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- United States v. EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- United States v. Robert P. DelkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Ramon FaluCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Hassan HazimeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Velasco Lopez v. DeckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Gerald SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Melendez-CarrionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- United States v. MercedesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Orlando Gonzales Claudio and Isaac Camacho-NegronCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.