Legal Opinion

Claudia Lown v. Continental Casualty Company

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 2, 2001No. 00-1547PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge TRAXLER and Senior judge CACHERIS joined.

OPINION

WILKINSON, Chief Judge:

Claudia Lown argues that the federal courts lack subject matter jurisdiction over this case because her long term disability plan was a church plan not governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (1994) (“ERISA”). Lown further argues that if jurisdiction is proper, the district court erred in finding that she was not totally disabled under the plan. Because ERISA applies to Lown’s plan, and because…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Robert A. Haley v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Torres v. Bella Vista Hospital, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007
  2. Medina v. Catholic Health InitiativesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  3. Overall v. AscensionDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  4. Rollins v. Dignity HealthDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
  5. Catholic Charities of Maine, Inc. v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API