Legal Opinion

Medina v. Catholic Health Initiatives

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 19, 2017No. 16-1005PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge.

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (ERISA), generally exempts from its requirements “church plans”—employee-benefit plans established and maintained by churches for their employees. ERISA also extends that church-plan exemption to so-called principal-purpose organizations. A principal-purpose organization is a church-affiliated organization whose principal purpose is administering or funding a benefit plan for the employees of a church or a church-affiliated nonprofit organization.

Catholic Health Initiatives (CHI) is a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Cutter v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Catholic BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Kedroff v. Saint Nicholas Cathedral of the Russian Orthodox Church in North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Sheilar Smith v. OSF Healthcare SystemCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Sally Sanzone v. Mercy HealthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  3. High Desert Relief, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  4. Rollins v. Dignity HealthDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
  5. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. Ca Secure Choice Retire. Svg.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API