Salomon v. Angsten
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Edward Ramos, J.), entered March 18, 2004, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and to confirm the report of the special referee, imposed sanctions against plaintiff and his former counsel, and denied plaintiff’s motion to amend an interrogatory response, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
As the motion court held, the parties’ letter agreement at most gave plaintiff an exclusive agency, not an exclusive right, *144to enter into design licensing agreements on defendants’ behalf; therefore,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Poster v. PosterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- IBM Credit Financing Corp. v. Mazda Motor Manufacturing (USA) Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Carroll v. GammermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Vastwin Investments, Ltd. v. Aquarius Media Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Harvard Associates, Ltd. v. Hayt, Hayt & LandauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- CDR Créances S.A. v. Euro-American Lodging Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Lee v. SolimanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006