Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Gammerman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 19, 1993PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
This dispute arises out of the stipulated settlement of an action entitled Birch v Carroll (Sup Ct, NY County, index No. 15766/90). In January 1993, petitioners moved to compel compliance with the provisions of the settlement agreement by respondent Birch. Birch opposed, contending that a particular painting required to be returned by petitioners to respondent had not been delivered, as agreed, but that another painting by the same artist was substituted for the designated work.
Supreme Court conducted a trial of this framed issue at which petitioner, Joseph P. Carroll, and…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- MATTER OF STATE OF NY v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Matter of Hogan v. Court of General SessionsNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Stanzione v. Consumer Builders, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- King v. BurkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Venture Magazine, Inc. v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
4Cited by11 opinions
- People v. ArnoldNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Stow v. StowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Reed Foundation, Inc. v. Franklin D. Roosevelt Four Freedoms Park, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re StephenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Salomon v. AngstenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.