Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Hugo Neu Proler International

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 25, 1990No. B044910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TURNER, J.

I. Procedural History

On April 19, 1989, Plaintiff, Grace Vaughn, filed a complaint for damages and injunctive relief against defendants Hugo Neu Proler International (Neu), Proler International Corporation, Neil Kerney and Jack Fletcher (Fletcher). The complaint alleged causes of action for violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, § 51 et seq.) (first), intentional and negligent interference with prospective business advantage (second and third), intentional infliction of emotional distress (fourth), negligent infliction of emotional distress (fifth) and civil…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. O'CONNOR v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Koire v. Metro Car WashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Scripps Clinic v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Gayer v. Polk Gulch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Davis v. Krivacic CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Gayer v. Polk Gulch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Gayer v. Polk Gulch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API