Vaughn v. Hugo Neu Proler International
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, J.
I. Procedural History
On April 19, 1989, Plaintiff, Grace Vaughn, filed a complaint for damages and injunctive relief against defendants Hugo Neu Proler International (Neu), Proler International Corporation, Neil Kerney and Jack Fletcher (Fletcher). The complaint alleged causes of action for violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, § 51 et seq.) (first), intentional and negligent interference with prospective business advantage (second and third), intentional infliction of emotional distress (fourth), negligent infliction of emotional distress (fifth) and civil…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- O'CONNOR v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Koire v. Metro Car WashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Scripps Clinic v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Gayer v. Polk Gulch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Davis v. Krivacic CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Gayer v. Polk Gulch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Gayer v. Polk Gulch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991