Nunamta Aulukestai v. State, Department of Natural Resources
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Senior Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Challenged in this case are land and water use permits allowing intensive mineral exploration on State land. The main question we address is whether the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) had to give public notice before issuing the permits. Because the Alaska Constitution requires public notice when interests in land are transferred, the answer to this question depends on whether the permits conveyed an interest in land. After a trial, the superior court held that notice was not required because the permits were nominally and functionally…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Parisi v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- The Wilderness Society v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Jacob v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Northern Alaska Environmental Center v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Alyeska Ski Corporation v. HoldsworthAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alaska Conservation Foundation v. Pebble Limited PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Summer Sagoonick v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
- Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Inc. v. State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources and Alaska Mental Health Trust AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
- In Re Hospitalization of Paige M.Alaska Supreme Court · 2018
- In Re Necessity for the Hospitalization of Heather R.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.