Legal Opinion

Harrill & Sutter, PLLC v. Kosin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 9, 2011No. 10-518PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COURTNEY HUDSON HENRY, Justice.

| Appellant Harrill & Sutter, PLLC (“Harrill”) appeals a Garland County Circuit Court order ruling that appellee Cynthia Kosin discharged Harrill for cause, thereby determining the attorney’s fee, pursuant to Arkansas’s attorney-lien statute, Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-22-304 (Supp.2009), based upon quantum-meruit recovery rather than the parties’ fee agreement. For reversal, Harrill argues that the circuit court erroneously applied the attorney-lien statute. Kosin brings a cross-appeal seeking attorney’s fees pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated section…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chrisco v. Sun Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Marcum v. WengertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Little Rock Wastewater Utility v. Larry Moyer Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. CoursonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. City of Rockport v. City of MalvernSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Carter v. ClineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  2. Harrill & Sutter, P.L.L.C. v. KosinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Bank of the Ozarks v. CosseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  4. Arkansas Realtors Ass'n v. Real Forms, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  5. Anderson's Taekwondo v. LandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API