Harrill & Sutter, PLLC v. Kosin
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
COURTNEY HUDSON HENRY, Justice.
| Appellant Harrill & Sutter, PLLC (“Harrill”) appeals a Garland County Circuit Court order ruling that appellee Cynthia Kosin discharged Harrill for cause, thereby determining the attorney’s fee, pursuant to Arkansas’s attorney-lien statute, Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-22-304 (Supp.2009), based upon quantum-meruit recovery rather than the parties’ fee agreement. For reversal, Harrill argues that the circuit court erroneously applied the attorney-lien statute. Kosin brings a cross-appeal seeking attorney’s fees pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated section…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chrisco v. Sun Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Marcum v. WengertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Little Rock Wastewater Utility v. Larry Moyer Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. CoursonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- City of Rockport v. City of MalvernSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Carter v. ClineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Harrill & Sutter, P.L.L.C. v. KosinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Bank of the Ozarks v. CosseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
- Arkansas Realtors Ass'n v. Real Forms, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Anderson's Taekwondo v. LandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.