Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jack Bell Lumber Co. v. Will

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 12, 1963No. 39761Published

1DissentBlackbird, Chief Justice

I cannot concur in the Majority opinion.. As I view the opinion, it unjustifiably deprives the defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Will, of' the partial recoupment of their losses granted them by a trial court judgment that is. neither contrary to law nor to the evidence, and, under all recognized rules of' appellate review, is beyond the proper prerogative of this court to reverse.

In this case, defendants’ theory was that,, although their written real estate mortgage was not executed by W. F. Taylor until August 29, 1956, they had an equitable mortgage antedating that, and arising out of" their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Northwestern Portland Cement Co. v. Atlantic Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. West v. Great Western Power Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Collins v. LackeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Metcalf v. DrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API