Stuart v. Hicks
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, McIntosh County; Preslie B. Cole, Judge. ■ Action by Pearl Hicks against I. 0. Stuart. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant, brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
MATHEWS, C.
The parties will be referred to here as they were designated in the trial court. The plaintiff, Pearl Hicks, is a negress and freedman citizen of the Creek Nation, and as such was allotted 160 acres of land in McIntosh county. On the first day of August, 1912, she made a deed to all of said land to the defendant. Soon thereafter she instituted suit against defendant for the cancellation of said deed, alleging that said deed was obtained through fraud and deception. After the institution of said suit plaintiff and defendant agreed to a settlement of their differences, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Long v. BagwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Interstate Crude Oil Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harjo v. BlackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Wood v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Davis v. MimeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Sherry v. RoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- In Re Initiative Petitions Nos. 112 to 118Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.