Legal Opinion

University of Texas at Arlington v. Bishop

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 19, 1999No. 2-98-274-CVPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAYCE, Chief Justice.

The principal question we are asked to decide in this case is whether a private attorney may recover attorney’s fees and expenses out of a self-insured state governmental entity’s worker’s compensation subrogation lien. Because we conclude that a private attorney is entitled to such a recovery, and that the University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) is not entitled to prevail on its other points, we will affirm the judgment of the trial court.

BACKGROUND

On April 17, 1996, William Bishop, a former UTA employee, was injured in a work-related traffic accident due to the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Federal Sign v. Texas Southern UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. BullerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Goode v. ShoukfehTexas Supreme Court · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Herring v. Welborn, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  2. Sterling v. Alexander, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  3. Texas Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. City of San Antonio v. Marin, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  5. Leigh Gomer v. Altha/Ann Steinlage, Donald Davis and Ruby Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API