Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Insurance v. Dynamic Development Group, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 17, 2005No. 04-2311UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The present litigation arose from a large-scale construction project in which performance and payment bonds and a dual obligee rider, issued in connection with the loan for the project, were allegedly fraudulently created. The appellant, Dynamic Development Group, LLC (DDG) seeks a new trial on the basis of alleged errors in the jury instructions and verdict form. We affirm.

I

A. Factual Background. 1

On September 10, 1990, the Cincinnati Insurance Company, the Cincinnati Casualty Company, and the Cincinnati Indemnity Company (collectively Cincinnati) entered into an agency agreement (the Agency…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Klein v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  2. Cincinnati Insurance v. Centech Building Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
  3. Cincinnati Insurance v. Dynamic Development Group, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Toby Pack v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API