Legal Opinion

Key Bank v. Latshaw

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 10, 1993No. 92-541PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

These two cases, consolidated on appeal by the defendants, involve the efforts of the plaintiff, Key Bank of Maine (bank), to collect a judgment of nearly three million dollars from defendant John H. Latshaw, Sr. In one case, Mr. Latshaw challenges the Superior Court’s (Barry, J.) order requiring him to make periodic payments to the bank of $10,000 per month, arguing that the court heard no evidence to support it. The trial court’s fact-finding mission was hampered by Mr. Latshaw’s extensive invocation of the privilege against self-incrimination. We reverse the court’s periodic payment order…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. State ex rel. Boswell v. CurtisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Tobias v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PelletierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. State v. GordonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  3. DeMauro v. DeMauroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API