Legal Opinion

DeMauro v. DeMauro

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 16, 1998No. 97-136PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.

The defendant, Joseph M. DeMauro, appeals a decision of the Superior Court (McHugh, J.) ruling that he improperly asserted his State and federal privilege against self-incrimination. We reverse and remand.

In February 1994, the plaintiff, Annette B. DeMauro, filed a libel for divorce against the defendant. In the libel she alleged that the *881defendant had engaged in a systematic effort to conceal assets accumulated during their marriage by creating and fraudulently using trusts, foundations, sham corporations, offshore accounts, straws and other entities. The plaintiff also filed the required…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. Doe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. McCarthy v. ArndsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DeMauro v. DeMauroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  2. In re JonesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  3. American Express Trave v. MoskoffSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API