Legal Opinion

State v. Dunlap

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 2, 2001No. 3365PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Judge:

Laterrance Ramone Dunlap appeals his conviction for distribution of crack cocaine. Dunlap argues he was prejudiced by comments made by the Circuit Court judge who presided over qualification of the entire jury panel for the week. Dunlap additionally contends the trial judge erroneously admitted evidence of his prior convictions. We affirm.

FACTSIPROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On the evening of April 2, 1999, undercover police officers observed Dunlap outside his family’s home engaged in a transaction with two individuals who had stopped by to visit with him. The police detained one of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ohler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. State v. BRITTSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  5. State v. HugheySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BlackSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  2. Pineda v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. DunlapSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
  5. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API