Legal Opinion

In re K.H.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1985No. 85-049PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

Due to the excessive lapse of time and in light of the singular im*268portance of this matter this Court suspends the rules pursuant to Rule 3, M.R.App.Civ.P., and invokes its inherent supervisory powers.

On November 26, 1984, the Rosebud County Attorney petitioned in District Court for intervention in a domestic relationship wherein K.H., a child, was allegedly being sexually abused. This petition was one for temporary investigative authority and protective services pursuant to section 41-3-402. MCA.

At the initial hearing on December 6,1984, the affidavit supporting the petition…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Safeco Insurance Co. of Illinois v. Montana Eighth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In re B.P.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re BPMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Safeco Insurance Co. of Illinois v. Montana Eighth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API