Legal Opinion

Arkell Safety Bag Co. v. Safepack Mills

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 7, 1923No. 1568PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMYTH, Chief Justice.

Arkell Safety Bag Company, owner of the mark “Arksafe,” which was registered for it in the Patent Office July *61723, 1901, opposed the application of Safepack Mills for the registration of the mark “Safepack.” The latter company claims use of its mark only since May, 1914, and is therefore junior to the opposer. Both marks are applied to wrapping paper; hence to goods of the same descriptive properties. The opposition is grounded on the contentions (1) that the registration of the applicant’s mark would be likely to produce confusion; (2) that it is descriptive of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re American Steel FoundriesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hercules Powder Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1946
  2. Broderick v. L. Mitchell & Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Hamilton Brown Shoe Co. v. Sam B. Wolf Sons Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  4. Sweeny v. ReplogleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API