Hamilton Brown Shoe Co. v. Sam B. Wolf Sons Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge
This is an appeal, in an opposition proceeding, from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents.
In its application for registration, filed April 30, 1926, appellant stated that it had continuously used the trade-mark “American Lady ” on “ Ladies and Misses ” shoes since Nov. 7, 1900.
In its notice of opposition, appellee alleged that it was the owner of the trade-mark “ The American Girl ”; that it and its predecessor had continuously used its trade-mark on ladies’ and misses’ shoes since long prior to the year 1900; that on August 21,1906, a certificate of registration was issued to it — No.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- President Suspender Co. v. MacwilliamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Waukesha Hygeia Mineral Springs Co. v. Hygeia Sparkling Distilled Water Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- Arkell Safety Bag Co. v. Safepack MillsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
3Cited by2 opinions
- California Packing Corp. v. Sun-Maid Raisin Growers of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
- California Packing Corp. v. Sun-Maid Raisin Growers of CaliforniaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933