Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. United Hatters, Cap & Millinery Workers International Union, Afl-Cio

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 6, 1962No. 14287Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER.

It appearing to the Court that by order of June 6, 1961, 6 Cir., 290 F.2d 591, the Court struck from its order of March 17, 1961, 6 Cir., 288 F.2d 436, the following language: “Upon the objection of the respondent to the use of the words ‘or any other employer’ as used in the order, the Court finds that the respondent made no specific objection to the board to the use of these words in the examiner’s interim report, and that the question cannot now be raised in this Court. Section 160(e), Title 29 U.S.C.”; and by said order of June 6, 1961, held in abeyance pending the decision of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Cheney California Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. United Hatters, Cap & Millinery Workers International Union, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. United Hatters, Cap & Millinery Workers International Union, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API