Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. United Hatters, Cap & Millinery Workers International Union, Afl-Cio
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 6, 1961No. 14287_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
The respondent, United Hatters, Cap & Millinery Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, has filed a petition for rehearing upon the order of this Court enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board.
It is claimed that the Court should have modified the order of the Board by striking therefrom the words, any other employer” from paragraph l.(b) of the order. Although there seems to be very little significance to this phrase, either as a detriment to the respondent or as an advantage to the Board, it and other similar phrases have been the subject of considerable judicial opinion.
In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Cheney California Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Communications Workers v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local 926, International Union of Operating Engineers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- National Labor Relations Board v. Brandman Iron CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- National Labor Relations Board v. Communications Workers of America, Afl-Cio, and Local No. 4372, Communications Workers of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re RhotenDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983
- National Labor Relations Board v. United Hatters, Cap & Millinery Workers International Union, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962