Legal Opinion

State v. Hebert

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 12, 1923No. 26165Published

1DissentO’Niell, C. J.

Writing a dissenting opinion cannot change the result in this case because the court did not reserve to the defendant the right to apply for a rehearing, when the case was decided against him, on the rehearing that was granted to the state. But the court’s ruling in the case, with regard to section 980 of the Revised] Statutes, seems to me so very wrong that I am impelled to do what I can to see it corrected some day.

In the first opinion handed down in this case, I failed to cite the decision in State v. Ryder, 36 La. Ann. 294; and it was also overlooked by the court and council while the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. KilshawSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  2. State v. JosephSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  3. State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  4. State v. McGuireSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. State v. RyderSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API