Legal Opinion
State v. Kilshaw
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 2, 1925No. 26968PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrunot, J.
The defendant was prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced for operating a gambling game in violation of section 2 of Act No. 12 of 1870. From the judgment and sentence he has appealed.
There are two hills of exception in the record, and defendant has filed an assignment of errors in this court.
The recitals in bill No. 1 and in the assignment of error are identical and, with one exception, the recitals in bill No. 2 are substantially so.
Bill No. 1 was reserved to the overruling of a demurrer to the information, and bill No. 2 was reserved to the overruling of a motion for a new trial.
In bill No. 2…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. AckermanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
- State v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1860
- State v. BurkhalterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- State v. RabbSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
- City of New Orleans v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1852
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
- State v. MurffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- State v. FloraneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Pinder v. Board of Supervisors of ElectionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.