Legal Opinion

Capen v. Crowell

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 31, 1877PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On exceptions. ASSUMPSIT.

1Opinion of the Court

Appleton, O. J.

This is an action upon a promissory note of the following tenor:

“$557.78. • Waterville, June 14, 1870.

Four months from date, I promise to pay to the order of A. M„ Capen five hundred and fifty-seven 78-100 dollars, at Ticonic National JBank, value received, with interest at rate of two and one-half per cent, each month after due until paid.

A. Crowell.”

The presiding justice instructed the jury to compute interest on this note at the rate of two and one-half per cent, each month after due, until paid ; and the jury rendered a verdict in accordance with such instruction. To this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brewster v. WakefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. Hubbard v. CallahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
  3. Mason v. Callender, Flint, & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1858
  4. Kent v. BownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1859

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Union Estates Co. v. . Adlon Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. National Life Ins. Co. v. HaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API