Capen v. Crowell
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On exceptions. ASSUMPSIT.
1Opinion of the Court
Appleton, O. J.
This is an action upon a promissory note of the following tenor:
“$557.78. • Waterville, June 14, 1870.
Four months from date, I promise to pay to the order of A. M„ Capen five hundred and fifty-seven 78-100 dollars, at Ticonic National JBank, value received, with interest at rate of two and one-half per cent, each month after due until paid.
A. Crowell.”
The presiding justice instructed the jury to compute interest on this note at the rate of two and one-half per cent, each month after due, until paid ; and the jury rendered a verdict in accordance with such instruction. To this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brewster v. WakefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Hubbard v. CallahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
- Mason v. Callender, Flint, & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1858
- Kent v. BownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1859
3Cited by2 opinions
- Union Estates Co. v. . Adlon Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- National Life Ins. Co. v. HaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916