Legal Opinion
Johns v. Ford Motor Credit Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1990No. Nos. 88-2091 and 89-165PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
This case presents two issues for our consideration.
The first issue is whether a car dealer violates the Retail Installment Sales Act, R.C. 1317.07, by selling a new car at a price in excess of the sticker or manufacturer’s suggested list price.
R.C. 1317.07 provides in pertinent part:
“No retail installment contract authorized by section 1317.03 of the Revised Code which is executed in connection with any retail installment sale shall evidence any indebtedness in excess of the time balance fixed in the written instrument in compliance with section 1317.04 of the Revised Code * * * i)
R.C.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stasher v. Harger-HaldemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- In re SloanDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1968
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nuvell Credit Corp. v. WestfallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Nuvell Credit Corporation v. Jamie WestfallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010