Legal Opinion

United States v. Cornwell

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided October 1, 1998No. 97-0623; Crim.App. No. 32169PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Chief Judge:

The granted issue in this case asks:

WHETHER THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE’S 7 MAY 1996 STAFF SUMMARY SHEET TO THE CONVENING AUTHORITY CONTAINS “NEW MATTER” WHICH WAS NOT PROVIDED TO DEFENSE COUNSEL FOR COMMENT AS REQUIRED BY RCM 1106(f)(7).

Appellant, a service academy graduate, was convicted in accordance with his pleas of making a false official statement, damaging military property, and conduct unbecoming an officer (one specification each of wrongfully using a cipher lock code and wrongfully gaining access to restricted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. NarineUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. MoseleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  4. United States v. BullerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  2. United States v. AndersonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  3. United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  4. United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  5. United States v. BlackettUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API