Legal Opinion

Amerson v. Lancaster

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1992No. 918SC421PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Judge.

Summary judgment is proper only when there is no genuine issue of material fact and one party is therefore entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Frye v. Arrington, 58 N.C.App. 180, 292 S.E.2d 772 (1982). In the present case since the parties agreed on the facts, the controversy centers upon the construction to be given the reservation in the 1965 deed, whereby the life tenants retained the right to convey “certain lots which may from time to time be designated by them.”

In asserting the reservation gave the life tenant the right to convey certain lots, defendants assign as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. River Birch Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Stegall v. Housing Authority of the City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Builders Supplies Co. of Goldsboro, NC, Inc. v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Thompson v. . UmbergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Vestal v. VestalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DEF OF HICKORY, LLC v. HoneycuttCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Kings Harbor Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. GoldmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. Walker v. BRSS, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API