Helgevold v. Civil Service Commission
Court of Appeals of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
OXBERGER, Chief Judge.
This appeal presents issues of first impression affecting public employees and the unions that represent them. The specific issue we address on appeal is whether reducing certain fringe benefits constitutes a demotion which can occur only as specified in our Code. The changes were made within the same class of employees who perform similar duties and receive the same pay. After weighing the varying theories and viewpoints in this area, we hold that, in this instance, where fringe benefits were lowered for some employees and raised for others within the same class, for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sieg v. CIV. SERV. COM'N OF WEST DES MOINESSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Fucik v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Smith v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Matter of Beggs v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Sterling v. COM., DEPT. OF ENV. RESOURCESSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McBride v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Arden v. State Employees' Appeals CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Arden & Coulter v. STATE EMP. APP. COM'NIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- City of Des Moines v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002