Legal Opinion

Gary Barbera Dodge, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 17, 1997No. 35 E.D. Appeal Docket 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIGRO, Justice.

Gary Barbera Dodge, Inc. (“Barbera”) appeals from the Commonwealth Court’s determination that Barbera failed to submit timely automobile title applications to the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (“Penn-DOT”) and that delivery to an authorized messenger service was not a “relevant mitigating event.” For the following reasons, we reverse in part.

Barbera is a licensed new and used automobile dealer which performs title work on the vehicles it sells. On November 19, 1993, PennDOT notified Barbera that it had filed untimely title applications on fifty-nine occasions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Com., Dept. of Transp. v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. BoucherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Gary Barbera Dodge, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Motor VehiclesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Philadelphia Honda, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lamond v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. PennDOT v. Poe, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API