Lamond v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
NARICK, Senior Judge.
The issue before this Court is whether a breathalyzer’s results, which varied by more than .02 percent and thus, was taken out of service according to the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) regulations, is tantamount to a malfunctioning unit, allowing police officers to request a second chemical test from a suspected drunk driver.
DOT appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County that sustained the appeal of Joseph T. La-mond from DOT’s suspension of his driving privileges mandated by 75 Pa.C.S. § 1547(b)(1). 1 We reverse.
The facts are…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Com., Dept. of Transp. v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Com., Dept. of Transp. v. McFarrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- COM., DEPT. OF TRANS. v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Occhibone v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reinhart v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Karabinos v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999