Legal Opinion

Lamond v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 10, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

The issue before this Court is whether a breathalyzer’s results, which varied by more than .02 percent and thus, was taken out of service according to the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) regulations, is tantamount to a malfunctioning unit, allowing police officers to request a second chemical test from a suspected drunk driver.

DOT appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County that sustained the appeal of Joseph T. La-mond from DOT’s suspension of his driving privileges mandated by 75 Pa.C.S. § 1547(b)(1). 1 We reverse.

The facts are…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Com., Dept. of Transp. v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Com., Dept. of Transp. v. McFarrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. COM., DEPT. OF TRANS. v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Occhibone v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reinhart v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Karabinos v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API