Sorrells v. Cole
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Justice.
The bill in this cause was filed by Mrs. L. E. Cole, appellee, to establish a ■ lost mortgage, and for foreclosure of same, and, in the alternative, for the enforcement of a vendor’s lien upon the lands described in the bill.
The sufficiency of the bill, as last amended, was not challenged, nor was the cross-bill filed by the respondent, A. J. Norris, tested by demprrer. Its equity seems to be admitted. We are of the opinion that the pleadings, while loosely drawm in some respects, were sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the court over the matters litigated.
It appears…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shorter v. SheppardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Campbell v. GoldthwaiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- City of Eufaula v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Fields v. Drennen & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1896
- Union Baptist Church v. RoperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bates v. BatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Plann v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940