Legal Opinion

United States v. Graham

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 25, 2008No. C 06-00725 SIPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF JENCKS ACT AND BRADY/GIG-LIO MATERIALS

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

On April 25, 2008, the Court heard argument on defendant’s request for production of Jencks Act and Brady/Giglio materials, as well as defendant’s motion to compel the United States Anti-Doping Agency (“USADA”) to produce certain documents. Having considered the arguments of counsel and the papers submitted, the Court hereby GRANTS defendant’s motion as to USADA and DENIES AS MOOT defendant’s motion as to the government.

BACKGRO…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. In Re California Public Utilities Commission. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. BergonziDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API