Legal Opinion
Groetken v. Davis (In Re Davis)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 15, 2000No. BAP No. UT-99-027, Bankruptcy No. 97-28235, Adversary No. 97-2410PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBINSON, Bankruptcy Judge.
Debtor Todd Davis (“Davis”) appeals the judgment of the bankruptcy court determining the debt owed Philip Groetken (“Groetken”) was nondischargeable due to fraud under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), 1 as well as imposing sua sponte sanctions in the form of attorney fees against both Davis and counsel under Fed. R. Bankr.P. 9011. The court also awarded costs to Groetken. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the court’s finding of nondischargeability and award of costs. The appeal of Barrett & Daines is DISMISSED for lack of appellate jurisdiction. The order…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Haney v. Copeland (In Re Copeland)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2003
- Bernard Lumber Co. v. Patrick (In Re Patrick)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001
- Wolf v. McGuire (In Re McGuire)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2002
- Sonny Penix v. Parra (In re Parra)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- In Re StreckerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2000
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.