Russell v. Pacific Railway Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. Walter' Van Dyke, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
The plaintiff brings this action as a judgment creditor of. the Pacific Railway Company, in his own behalf and for other creditors of the corporate defendant and of the Los Angeles Cable Railway Com- , pany, for the appointment of a receiver, for the sale of its property, and that the sum due from stockholders of the Pacific Railway Company on their stock, so far as necessary, may be called in. Numerous stockholders resident in California are made defendants.
A complaint in intervention was filed in behalf of numerous persons who claim to be creditors of the Pacific Railway Company in various…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fourth Nat. Bank of NY v. FrancklynSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Jessup v. . CarnegieNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Bank of North America v. RindgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Young v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Fowler v. LamsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gold v. Los Angeles Democratic LeagueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Orloff v. Los Angeles Turf Club, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1947
- In Re BrambiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Ferguson v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Cook v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.