Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Sherman

California Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1897No. L. A. No. 222PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. J. W. McKinley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Appeals from the judgment and from the order denying a new trial.

Plaintiff pleaded that the defendant, the Electric Rapid Transit Company, was a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Kansas, and that it was not a railway, religious, or charitable corpo*172ration. He further alleged a judgment obtained against the corporation in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Kansas, for the sum of seven thousand seven hundred and seventeen dollars and fifty cents, together with costs; that he caused execution issued out of the court to be levied upon the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dennick v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Flash v. ConnSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Guerney v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  4. Howell v. A. Manglesdorf & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  5. Aldrich v. Anchor Coal Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Howarth v. LombardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  2. Hale v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Mize v. Rocky Mountain Bell Telephone Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Hancock National Bank v. EllisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  5. Board of Railroad Commissioners v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API