Citizens Bank v. Schwarzschild & Sultzberger Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Court of Law and Chancery of the city of Norfolk in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.
This is an action of assumpsit to recover money paid by the plaintiff under an alleged mistake of fact. Upon the issue of non-assumpsit, the whole matter of law and fact was submitted to the court and a judgment rendered in favor of the defendant.
The material facts of the case are that on the 4th day of November, 1907, the defendant, the Schwarzschild and Sulzberger Company, a corporation, presented through the Norfolk National Bank of Norfolk, for payment, fifteen coupons of seventy dollars each, due on the first day of that month, taken from bonds held by the defendant. The bonds from which…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oddie v. . the Nat. City Bank of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Pratt v. . FooteNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Arents v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1868
- First National Bank of Detroit v. BurkhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Levy v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1802
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Security Nat. Bank of Sioux City v. Old Nat. Bank of Battle CreekCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- Bank of Naperville v. CatalanoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Central Bank and Trust Company v. General Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Kirby v. First & Merchants National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1969
- National Exchange Bank v. Ginn & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.