First National Bank of Detroit v. Burkham
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Superior Court of Detroit.
1Opinion of the Court
Cooley, J:
This case is certainly novel and peculiar. The drawees seek to recover from the payees the amount of a bill which they have accepted and paid, and the genuineness of which is not disputed. The ground upon which they plant their right of recovery is, that they have paid under a mistake of fact. The mistake consisted in their security from the drawer of the bill being fictitious, when they supposed it to be genuine and reliable.
Admitting this to be so, how does the fact concern the payees? Do they assume to guarantee the fairness of the dealings of the drawers with the drawees, or the…
2Cited by24 opinions
- Security Nat. Bank of Sioux City v. Old Nat. Bank of Battle CreekCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- Cohen v. First National Bank of NogalesArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Young & Son v. Lehman, Durr & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- A. Morrison & Co. v. Farmers & Merchants BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Ebberts v. Carpenter Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.