Legal Opinion

Merchants & Manufacturers' Bank v. Stone

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1878PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to Superior Court of Detroit. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

During the period between the summer of 1871 and the fall of 1875, the bank transacted a large amount of business in the way of discounting paper and otherwise with a concern appearing to the bank and the public and purporting to be a corporation bearing the name of “ The Charles Stone Timber Company,” and all this business was undertaken and prosecuted by the bank upon the specific understanding that the concern was contracting as a corporation and not otherwise. Indeed the bank dealt with it throughout as a corporation in fact and without any qualification or reserve, recognized it as one.

In…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Swartwout v. Michigan Air Line RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Smith v. SheeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Dutchess Cotton Manufactory v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1817
  5. Eaton v. . AspinwallNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Harrill v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. Snider's Sons' Co. v. TroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. American Salt Co. v. HeidenheimerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Doty v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Baldwin v. HosmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API