Fisher v. City of New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
Insofar as plaintiff’s claim seeking monetary compensation from the municipality for his eleven year imprisonment after a conviction for manslaughter in violation of due process of law, is based upon 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, we affirm on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. The attempt to distinguish Monroe v. Pape, 1961, 365 U.S. 167, 81 S.Ct. 473, 5 L.Ed.2d 492; Egan v. City of Aurora, 1961, 365 U.S. 514, 81 S.Ct. 684, 5 L.Ed.2d 741, and Spampinato v. City of New York, 2 Cir., 1962, 311 F.2d 439, is “patently without merit.” Bell v. Hood, 1946, 327 U.S. 678, 683, 66 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Egan v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Thomas O. Spampinato v. The City of New York and Guenther E. WinklerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Shaffer v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bennett v. GravelleDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1971
- Turpin v. MailetCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Atkins v. City of CharlotteDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1969
- Floyd T. Stanturf v. Donald SipesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Sanberg v. DaleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.