Legal Opinion

Atkins v. City of Charlotte

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1969No. Civ. 2274PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAVEN, Circuit Judge:

This is a civil action brought to obtain a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief declaring unconstitutional and preventing enforcement of Sections 95-97, 95-98 and 95-99 of the General Statutes of North Carolina. We hold G.S. 95-97 unconstitutional on its face. We hold G.S. § 95-98 a valid and constitutional exercise of the legislative authority of the General Assembly of North Carolina. As for G.S. § 95-99, we hold it to be so related to G.S. § 95-97 that it cannot survive the invalidation of that section.

Counsel have not been able to agree on findings of facts. We…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Melvin Carter v. John R. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  2. Bennett v. GravelleDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1971
  3. Gentile v. WallenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. Lodge 1858, American Federation of Government Employees v. Thomas O. Paine, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  5. Gentile v. WallenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API