Legal Opinion
Rocky 116 L.L.C. v. Weston
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided March 3, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Final judgment entered on or about June 17, 2002 affirmed, with $25 costs.
*364The trial evidence, fairly interpreted, supports Civil Court’s conclusion that tenant does not primarily reside in the subject studio apartment. The record clearly establishes that tenant— along with a woman who tenant described at trial as his “long-term girlfriend” — spent substantial amounts of time throughout the tenancy in a series of residences other than the studio apartment here at issue. Among the alternate residences used by tenant and his companion were two separate two-bedroom apartments…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Claridge Gardens, Inc. v. MenottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- 615 Co. v. MikeskaNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Berwick Land Corp. v. MucelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Emel Realty Corp. v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Emel Realty Corp. v. CareyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Katz Park Avenue Corp. v. JaggerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Toa Construction Co. v. TsitsiresCivil Court of the City of New York · 2005
- Budhu v. CastroAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2011