Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Pate

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1992No. 9112SC324PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

In granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the trial court concluded, inter alia-.

Conclusions of Law

3. As to the parties and subject matter of this action, the Court is of the opinion, concludes and so holds, that North Carolina General Statute 52-12 (later 52-6) and 47-39, are a form of gender based [sic] discrimination violative of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 19 of the North Carolina Constitution.

Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rabon v. Rowan Memorial Hospital IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. North Carolina National Bank v. Virginia Carolina BuildersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Cannon v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Kearney v. . VannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Whitley v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dunn v. PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Mahoney v. Ronnie's Road Service, Indian Head Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Rogerson v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Musi v. Town of ShallotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. ANDREWS EX REL. ANDREWS v. HaygoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API