Prentiss v. Sheffel
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Judge.
The question presented by this appeal is whether two majority partners in a three-man partnership-at-will, who have excluded the third partner from partnership management and affairs, should be allowed to purchase the partnership assets at a judicially supervised dissolution sale. We hold that on the facts of this case, such a purchase is proper, and affirm the judgment entered by the trial court.
Suit was originally brought by plaintiffs-appellees seeking dissolution of a partnership they had formed with defendant-appellant. The partnership was created for the purpose of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- von Au v. MagenheimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Theis v. Spokane Falls Gas Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
- Ex Parte KellerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- Young Mines Co., Ltd. v. SevringhausArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Foster v. AmesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Maras v. StilinovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Limmer v. OppenhuisenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981