Legal Opinion

Prentiss v. Sheffel

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 13, 1973No. 1 CA-CIV 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Judge.

The question presented by this appeal is whether two majority partners in a three-man partnership-at-will, who have excluded the third partner from partnership management and affairs, should be allowed to purchase the partnership assets at a judicially supervised dissolution sale. We hold that on the facts of this case, such a purchase is proper, and affirm the judgment entered by the trial court.

Suit was originally brought by plaintiffs-appellees seeking dissolution of a partnership they had formed with defendant-appellant. The partnership was created for the purpose of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. von Au v. MagenheimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Theis v. Spokane Falls Gas Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Ex Parte KellerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  4. Young Mines Co., Ltd. v. SevringhausArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Foster v. AmesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maras v. StilinovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Limmer v. OppenhuisenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API