Legal Opinion

In re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices Litigation

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided September 28, 2012No. MDL No. 1840; No. 07-MD-1840-KHVPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*491 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KATHRYN H. VRATIL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs bring putative class action claims for damages and injunctive relief against motor fuel retailers in 26 states (Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Virginia), the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Guam. Second Consolidated Amended Complaint (Doc. # 652) filed December 1, 2008 ¶ 11. Plaintiffs claim…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Rutter & Wilbanks Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Beasley v. TTEC Services CorporationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023
  2. Bilinsky v. Gatos Silver, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2024
  3. Brown v. JBS USA Food CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024
  4. Brown v. JBS USA Food CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025
  5. CO Craft, LLC v. Grubhub, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2022

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API