Opinion No. (2000)
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
Dear John Nance,
¶ 0 This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following question:
Pursuant to 13 O.S. 1991, § 176.8(E) is a law enforcementofficer, who is executing a wiretap order under the OklahomaSecurity of Communications Act and intercepts evidence of aplanned or completed crime, other than those enumerated in 13O.S. 1991, § 176.7[13-176.7], prohibited from using or disclosing thatinformation of the other crime to another law enforcement agencyfor action?
¶ 1 The Oklahoma Security of Communications Act (the "Act") was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Isadore MarionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Frick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
- United States v. LicavoliDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1978