Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (2000)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided September 20, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear John Nance,

¶ 0 This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following question:

Pursuant to 13 O.S. 1991, § 176.8(E) is a law enforcementofficer, who is executing a wiretap order under the OklahomaSecurity of Communications Act and intercepts evidence of aplanned or completed crime, other than those enumerated in 13O.S. 1991, § 176.7[13-176.7], prohibited from using or disclosing thatinformation of the other crime to another law enforcement agencyfor action?

¶ 1 The Oklahoma Security of Communications Act (the "Act") was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. Isadore MarionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  3. Frick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. United States v. LicavoliDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API