Columbia Weighing Machine Co. v. Vaughan
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harvey, J.:
This is an action for goods sold on a written contract. It was tried to the court. A demurrer was sustained to plaintiff’s evidence. Judgment was rendered for defendant and plaintiff has appealed.
The contract is in the form of an order -signed by the defendant, and, so far as here material, reads as follows:
“You may ship us one Columbia Mirror weighing machine, freight paid. It is sold to us with the understanding that we may return it to you at any time within thirty days from date of arrival of the machine; instead of paying the purchase…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kingman & Co. v. WatsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Pratt-Gilbert Co. v. RenaudArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- Hessig-Ellis Drug Co. v. SlySupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Aultman, Miller & Co. v. NilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Case Threshing Machine Co. v. DonalsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Calo, Inc. v. AMF Pinspotters, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- Allied Steel and Conveyors, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Empire MacHinery Co. v. Litton Business Telephone SystemsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Synnex Corp. v. ADT SECURITY SERV. INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- Ludowici-Celadon Co. v. McKinleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.