Legal Opinion

United States v. Morris

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 28, 1975No. 28,107PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*320OPINION OF THE COURT

Quinn, Judge:

This appeal brings up for consideration the effect of submission by the accused of a request for trial by judge alone after the court has assembled. The accused contends that, under Article 16, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 816, the time of submission is a jurisdictional requirement for trial by military judge alone and such trial cannot be had on the basis of a request by accused submitted after assembly of the court.

Four specifications of unauthorized absence against the accused were referred to a general court-martial for trial. Starting on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  3. United States v. DeanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  4. United States v. HeinelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. SonnenscheinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. TurnerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  2. United States v. JungbluthNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API