United States v. Silva
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COX, Judge.
In this ease, the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force has certified the following question:
WAS THE AIR FORCE COURT OF MILITARY REVIEW CORRECT IN HOLDING THAT EVIDENCE OF UNCHARGED MISCONDUCT, NORMALLY ADMISSIBLE IN A CONTESTED CASE, IS INADMISSIBLE WHEN THE ACCUSED PLEADS GUILTY?
We hold that the court below was incorrect, and we reverse.
The accused pleaded guilty to two specifications of committing lewd and lascivious acts upon different girls under the age of sixteen, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. A stipulation of fact…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. VickersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. MartinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. KeithU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. HardisonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- United States v. MullensUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. CiullaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. ShupeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.