Legal Opinion
Lin v. Rohm & Haas Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 26, 2012No. Civil Action No. 11-3158PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
YOHN, District Judge.
Dr. Manhua Mandy Lin brings this action against Rohm and Haas Company d/b/a Dow Advanced Materials (“Rohm and Haas”), alleging retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq,, and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (the “PHRA”), 43 Pa. Stat. Ann. §§ 951 et seq., as well as breach of contract and intentional interference with prospective contractual relations.
This is the latest in a series of lawsuits between the parties. Dr. Lin’s claims in this action stem largely from Rohm and Haas’s conduct in a prior…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Justin Wood v. Trustees of Dartmouth CollegeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2026